CITY TRIBUNE
Rapist failed to notify Gardaí of his return to Galway
A convicted rapist has claimed that he didn’t register on the Sex Offenders’ List because he had not understood his legal obligations due to his poor understanding of the English language.
Darius Savickis (47) of 28 An Fiodán, Doughiska, was before Galway District Court last week to face a charge of failing to notify the Gardaí on dates between November 13, 2015 and January 19 last year of his name, or names used by him, his home address and his date of birth, a requirement for registered sex offenders under the provision of the Sex Offenders Act 2001, as amended by the Human Trafficking Act 2008.
Represented by James McGuill, the court first heard an application to dismiss the charge on the basis that Savickis had been arrested on the day of his release from prison — he served two-and-a-half years of a six-year sentence for raping a woman in Galway City in 2005 — to be deported to serve an eight-month sentence in his native Lithuania for another rape.
Mr McGuill also submitted that his client’s grasp of the English language had handicapped his understanding of what his obligations were.
But Judge Mary Fahy said it was the defendant’s obligation to register as soon as he returned to Ireland and that as well as having been given interpreters, his legal representatives would have explained it to him.
During the three-and-a-half hour hearing, Mr McGuill raised serious concerns about the adequacy of the original interpretation services provided to his client on his arrest. He had sought the full transcript of the actual interview in Galway Garda Station and on cross-examining Garda witnesses, was satisfied that his client had not been served fairly.
In fact, Mr McGuill added, Savickis had never been served with his caution, charge sheet or other basic information in his native Lithuanian language, a breach of EU linguistic regulations.
Inspector Brendan Carroll said Savickis had an interpreter and had adequate representation all along and that he had not been prejudiced due to his lack of understanding of the procedure.
Detective Sergeant Adrian O’Neill told the court he had become aware on January 19 last year that Savickis was back residing in the city and had not registered that fact with him or anyone else on the force. He said Savickis had been back in Galway since January 2016, but had not complied with his obligation to update his details on the Sex Offenders’ Register.
He said Savickis had pleaded guilty in June 2009 to raping a female outside the Huntsman on College Road in 2005 and was placed on the Sex Offenders’ Register as soon as he was convicted and received a prison sentence. However, Savickis’ details on that register had not been updated since and that meant he was in breach of his obligation to do so. He added that Savickis was liable to be on that register for an indefinite period.
Replying to Mr McGuill, Det Sgt O’Neill said Gardaí needed to know the whereabouts of sex offenders and that Savickis had been obliged to register seven days after he had returned to Ireland.
He told the Court that Gardaí had become aware of Savickis’ presence in the jurisdiction when informed that the matter was about to be raised at a residents’ association meeting. Local people had been concerned that a sex offender was living on their estate.
He denied Mr McGuill’s suggestion that Gardaí had been made aware of his client in a much more sinister way when Galway County Council made enquiries during a Garda vetting exercise when Savickis became an applicant for social housing.
Niall Kennedy, a prison officer at Arbour Hill, said he had a lot of interaction with Savickis during his time in prison and believed the man’s English was “not fluent but a good working knowledge.”
He told the Court he had gone through the obligations with him before his release and that he made sure he understood them before he signed the form which was accompanied by an information booklet given to all sex offenders on their release.
There was no interpreter present for that as there was no need for one, said Mr Kennedy, who added that Savickis had intended contesting the European warrant out for his arrest at the time and had intended returning to Galway.
Mr McGuill argued that the form was “a significant legal document” that should have been provided to him in his native language which was again, an EU directive.
Mr Kennedy said Savickis was transferred to both Cloverhill and Portlaoise to await his deportation, which didn’t happen for another twelve months but he couldn’t say how or if the other prisons assisted him on that matter.
Detective Garda Pat Fahy was cross-examined for over an hour by Mr McGuill on how the interview with his client on January 19 last year had been conducted, transcribed and interpreted.
Mr McGuill pointed out that Det Garda Fahy’s memo was only four pages long, while the full transcript of the taped interview was 19 pages long.
The Garda explained that not every question was recorded by him in writing as he was mostly asking the questions.
Mr McGuill said some of the translation by the interpreter used by Gardaí that day fell short — the Garda replied that Savickis had replied 81 times in English and 51 times in his own language which indicated to him that the man had a good understanding of what was being said.
He said that Savickis had told him he had returned to Ireland on November 20, 2015 after spending a total of four-and-a-half years in prisons in Ireland and in Lithuania.
He said Savickis told him he now understood his obligation but hadn’t been aware he would be on the sex offenders register indefinitely.
He told him he was a building site scaffolder who lived with his partner and children in a rented house.
Replying to Mr McGuill on how Gardaí assigned interpreters, he said he rang up the company, translation.ie, which they always used and waited for an interpreter before starting the interview.
The court later heard evidence that the interpreter, a waitress, hadn’t been formally trained, and worked with them on a part-time basis for a very short time and was no longer interpreting.
Mr McGuill then asked the Court the hear the audio of the interview to compare it with the way it had been interpreted for his client.
Judge Fahy refused to hear it at the end of a long hearing day adding she didn’t think it was necessary for it to be heard.
But Mr McGuill insisted the State didn’t abide by their mandatory obligations to provide documents to his client in Lithuanian and asked for the matter to be adjourned to another day.
Judge Fahy agreed to adjourn it to November 13 and further said she would sign an order agreed between the defence and the prosecution for the High Court to decide whether the audio should be heard by her.
Savickis pleaded guilty in 2009 at the Central Criminal Court to orally raping a 23-year-old German woman who was walking home along the pathway behind The Huntsman in November 2005. The woman was left so distressed by the attack, she could only tell of her ordeal by pointing to the word ‘rape’ in the dictionary. Savickis was arrested after Gardaí got a DNA match with a sample held by police in the UK.
CITY TRIBUNE
Galway ‘masterplan’ needed to tackle housing and transport crises
From the Galway City Tribune – An impassioned plea for a ‘masterplan’ that would guide Galway City into the future has been made in the Dáil. Galway West TD Catherine Connolly stated this week that there needed to be an all-inclusive approach with “vision and leadership” in order to build a sustainable city.
Deputy Connolly spoke at length at the crisis surrounding traffic and housing in Galway city and said that not all of the blame could be laid at the door of the local authority.
She said that her preference would be the provision of light rail as the main form of public transport, but that this would have to be driven by the government.
“I sat on the local council for 17 years and despaired at all of the solutions going down one road, metaphorically and literally. In 2005 we put Park & Ride into the development plan, but that has not been rolled out. A 2016 transport strategy was outdated at the time and still has not been updated.
“Due to the housing crisis in the city, a task force was set up in 2019. Not a single report or analysis has been published on the cause of the crisis,” added Deputy Connolly.
She then referred to a report from the Land Development Agency (LDA) that identified lands suitable for the provision of housing. But she said that two-thirds of these had significant problems and a large portion was in Merlin Park University Hospital which, she said, would never have housing built on it.
In response, Minister Simon Harris spoke of the continuing job investment in the city and also in higher education, which is his portfolio.
But turning his attention to traffic congestion, he accepted that there were “real issues” when it came to transport, mobility and accessibility around Galway.
“We share the view that we need a Park & Ride facility and I understand there are also Bus Connects plans.
“I also suggest that the City Council reflect on her comments. I am proud to be in a Government that is providing unparalleled levels of investment to local authorities and unparalleled opportunities for local authorities to draw down,” he said.
Then Minister Harris referred to the controversial Galway City Outer Ring Road which he said was “struck down by An Bord Pleanála”, despite a lot of energy having been put into that project.
However, Deputy Connolly picked up on this and pointed out that An Bord Pleanála did not say ‘No’ to the ring road.
“The High Court said ‘No’ to the ring road because An Bord Pleanála acknowledged it failed utterly to consider climate change and our climate change obligations.
“That tells us something about An Bord Pleanála and the management that submitted such a plan.”
In the end, Minister Harris agreed that there needed to be a masterplan for Galway City.
“I suggest it is for the local authority to come up with a vision and then work with the Government to try to fund and implement that.”
CITY TRIBUNE
Official opening of Galway’s new pedestrian and cycle bridge
The new Salmon Weir pedestrian and cycle bridge will be officially opened to the public next Friday, May 26.
Work on the €10 million bridge got underway in April 2022, before the main structure was hoisted into place in early December.
A lunchtime tape-cutting ceremony will take place on Friday, as the first pedestrians and cyclists traverse the as-yet-unnamed bridge.
The Chief Executive of Galway City Council, Brendan McGrath, previously said the bridge, once opened, would remove existing conflicts between pedestrians, cyclists and traffic “as well as facilitating the Cross-City Link public transport corridor over the existing 200-year-old bridge”.
The naming of the new bridge has been under discussion by the Council’s Civic Commemorations Committee since late last year.
One name that has been in the mix for some time is that of the first woman in Europe to graduate with an engineering degree – Alice Perry.
Ms Perry, who was from Wellpark, graduated from Queen’s College Galway (now University of Galway) in 1906. The university’s engineering building is named in her honour.
The bridge was built by Jons Civil Engineering firm in County Meath and was assembled off-site before being transported to Galway. Funding for the project was provided in full by the National Transport Authority and the European Regional Development Fund.
(Photo: Sheila Gallagher captured the city’s new pedestrian footbridge being raised on the south side of the Salmon Weir Bridge in December. It will officially open next Friday, May 26).
CITY TRIBUNE
Minister branded ‘a disgrace’ for reversing land rezoning in Galway City
From the Galway City Tribune – Minister of State for Local Government and Planning, Kieran O’Donnell was labelled a “disgrace” for overturning councillors’ decisions to rezone land in the new City Development Plan.
Minister O’Donnell (pictured) confirmed in a letter to Council Chief Executive Brendan McGrath last week that he was reversing 25 material alternations made by councillors to the CDP 2023-29. He made the decision on the advice of Office of Planning Regulator (OPR).
Minister O’Donnell directed that 14 land parcels that were subject to land-use zoning changes by councillors as part of the Material Alterations to the Draft CDP should be reversed.
He directed that a further 11 land parcels in the city should become “unzoned”.
The Minister found that the CDP had not been made in a manner consistent with recommendations of the OPR, which required specific changes to the plan to ensure consistency with the national planning laws and guidelines.
At last week’s Council meeting Cllr Eddie Hoare (FG) asked for clarity on the process by which councillors could rezone the lands that had been changed by the Minister’s direction.
Cllr Declan McDonnell said, “What he [Minister O’Donnell] has done is an absolute disgrace”.
And he asked: “Do we have to have another development plan meeting to deal with it?”
Both Cllrs Hoare and McDonnell wondered what would become of the lands that were rezoned or unzoned by the ministerial direction.
Mr McGrath said the Council had put forward an argument in favour of retaining the material alterations in the plan, but ultimately the Minister sided with OPR.
He said if councillors want to make alterations to the new plan, they could go through the process of making a material alteration but this was lengthy.
The Save Roscam Peninsula campaign welcomed the Minister’s decision.
In a statement to the Galway City Tribune, it said the direction would mean the Roscam village area on the Roscam Peninsula will be unzoned and a number of land parcels would revert back to agriculture/high amenity.
A spokesperson for the campaign said: “the material alterations made by city councillors following lobbying by developers continued the long-standing practice of councillors facilitating a developer-led plan rather than an evidence- and policy-based plan that meets the needs of the city.
“The Minister’s direction is an important step in restoring confidence in the planning system. It is clear from the City Council’s own evidence on future housing projections that there was no requirement to zone these lands for residential purposes in order to meet the needs of the targeted population increase up to 2029,” the spokesperson added.