CITY TRIBUNE
Fears grow 2020 will not meet criteria for €1.5m EU fund
GALWAY 2020 could struggle to meet all five criteria set by the European Commission before it is eligible to draw down €1.5 million in European Capital of Culture prize money.
The European Commission has confirmed that a third formal monitoring meeting with Galway 2020 will take place this Autumn.
At that stage, the European Capital of Culture (ECOC) panel of experts will decide whether to recommend awarding the Melina Mercouri Prize to Galway or not.
If the European Commission accepts the Panel’s recommendation, the actual payment of the award will be made in the first few months of the ECOC year 2020. The prize is a fixed amount of €1.5 million.
In a statement to Galway City Tribune, the European Commission set out the criteria that will be checked by the panel at the monitoring meeting.
Number one on the list is that “there has been no substantial change in the vision, objectives, strategy, programme and budget since the bid book”.
The project as originally envisaged had a budget of €47 million, but that has since been revised downwards to €39 million.
So far, Galway 2020 has just €23 million ‘in the bank’, and unless it rapidly sources additional money, it could struggle to meet the ‘no substantial change in budget’ criterion to be eligible for the prize.
Four other standards must also be met before the European Commission money is paid.
They include: That the independence of the artistic team has been appropriately respected; that the European dimension has remained sufficiently strong in the programme; that the marketing and communication of the ECOC give due prominence to the ECOC as a European Union action; and that monitoring is taking place and arrangements for the final evaluation are in place.
“It is also important that adequate arrangements are made for the transition from the ECOC team to the legacy management,” a European Commission spokesperson said.
He confirmed that since the last formal monitoring meeting with Galway 2020 and the panel of experts, and the subsequent publication of a report last July, an extra meeting between Galway 2020 and the experts was held last November.
The November meeting wasn’t one of the three formal monitoring meetings of the ECOC monitoring process, so it was not followed by a report.
Asked how that monitoring meeting went, the spokesperson added: “There have been fruitful exchanges between the Panel and the City but nothing to report at this stage.”
Galway 2020, the company tasked to deliver the year-long designation, has been beset with problems since Galway won the honour of hosting the European Capital of Culture. These involve issues with funding, governance, staffing, communication and a lack of engagement with groups involved in the bid book.
The July monitoring report highlighted how Galway 2020 risked “losing track with the project” and risked “incurring further delays” if it failed to solve a number of problems highlighted by the European Commission.
Among the problems identified were budget concerns, delays in implementing certain aspects of the project, communication problems, and staffing issues.
Speaking on RTÉ Radio One’s Morning Ireland on Wednesday, Chair of the Board of Galway 2020, Arthur Lappin, said the bid book budget of €47 million was “obviously aspirational”. He conceded the event has been “scaled back a little bit”, but its budget would still be about €40 million. The “extraordinary valuable legacy” the event will leave, Mr Lappin said, is “beyond what people can appreciate”.
From the Galway City Tribune – An impassioned plea for a ‘masterplan’ that would guide Galway City into the future has been made in the Dáil. Galway West TD Catherine Connolly stated this week that there needed to be an all-inclusive approach with “vision and leadership” in order to build a sustainable city.
Deputy Connolly spoke at length at the crisis surrounding traffic and housing in Galway city and said that not all of the blame could be laid at the door of the local authority.
She said that her preference would be the provision of light rail as the main form of public transport, but that this would have to be driven by the government.
“I sat on the local council for 17 years and despaired at all of the solutions going down one road, metaphorically and literally. In 2005 we put Park & Ride into the development plan, but that has not been rolled out. A 2016 transport strategy was outdated at the time and still has not been updated.
“Due to the housing crisis in the city, a task force was set up in 2019. Not a single report or analysis has been published on the cause of the crisis,” added Deputy Connolly.
She then referred to a report from the Land Development Agency (LDA) that identified lands suitable for the provision of housing. But she said that two-thirds of these had significant problems and a large portion was in Merlin Park University Hospital which, she said, would never have housing built on it.
In response, Minister Simon Harris spoke of the continuing job investment in the city and also in higher education, which is his portfolio.
But turning his attention to traffic congestion, he accepted that there were “real issues” when it came to transport, mobility and accessibility around Galway.
“We share the view that we need a Park & Ride facility and I understand there are also Bus Connects plans.
“I also suggest that the City Council reflect on her comments. I am proud to be in a Government that is providing unparalleled levels of investment to local authorities and unparalleled opportunities for local authorities to draw down,” he said.
Then Minister Harris referred to the controversial Galway City Outer Ring Road which he said was “struck down by An Bord Pleanála”, despite a lot of energy having been put into that project.
However, Deputy Connolly picked up on this and pointed out that An Bord Pleanála did not say ‘No’ to the ring road.
“The High Court said ‘No’ to the ring road because An Bord Pleanála acknowledged it failed utterly to consider climate change and our climate change obligations.
“That tells us something about An Bord Pleanála and the management that submitted such a plan.”
In the end, Minister Harris agreed that there needed to be a masterplan for Galway City.
“I suggest it is for the local authority to come up with a vision and then work with the Government to try to fund and implement that.”
The new Salmon Weir pedestrian and cycle bridge will be officially opened to the public next Friday, May 26.
Work on the €10 million bridge got underway in April 2022, before the main structure was hoisted into place in early December.
A lunchtime tape-cutting ceremony will take place on Friday, as the first pedestrians and cyclists traverse the as-yet-unnamed bridge.
The Chief Executive of Galway City Council, Brendan McGrath, previously said the bridge, once opened, would remove existing conflicts between pedestrians, cyclists and traffic “as well as facilitating the Cross-City Link public transport corridor over the existing 200-year-old bridge”.
The naming of the new bridge has been under discussion by the Council’s Civic Commemorations Committee since late last year.
One name that has been in the mix for some time is that of the first woman in Europe to graduate with an engineering degree – Alice Perry.
Ms Perry, who was from Wellpark, graduated from Queen’s College Galway (now University of Galway) in 1906. The university’s engineering building is named in her honour.
The bridge was built by Jons Civil Engineering firm in County Meath and was assembled off-site before being transported to Galway. Funding for the project was provided in full by the National Transport Authority and the European Regional Development Fund.
(Photo: Sheila Gallagher captured the city’s new pedestrian footbridge being raised on the south side of the Salmon Weir Bridge in December. It will officially open next Friday, May 26).
From the Galway City Tribune – Minister of State for Local Government and Planning, Kieran O’Donnell was labelled a “disgrace” for overturning councillors’ decisions to rezone land in the new City Development Plan.
Minister O’Donnell (pictured) confirmed in a letter to Council Chief Executive Brendan McGrath last week that he was reversing 25 material alternations made by councillors to the CDP 2023-29. He made the decision on the advice of Office of Planning Regulator (OPR).
Minister O’Donnell directed that 14 land parcels that were subject to land-use zoning changes by councillors as part of the Material Alterations to the Draft CDP should be reversed.
He directed that a further 11 land parcels in the city should become “unzoned”.
The Minister found that the CDP had not been made in a manner consistent with recommendations of the OPR, which required specific changes to the plan to ensure consistency with the national planning laws and guidelines.
At last week’s Council meeting Cllr Eddie Hoare (FG) asked for clarity on the process by which councillors could rezone the lands that had been changed by the Minister’s direction.
Cllr Declan McDonnell said, “What he [Minister O’Donnell] has done is an absolute disgrace”.
And he asked: “Do we have to have another development plan meeting to deal with it?”
Both Cllrs Hoare and McDonnell wondered what would become of the lands that were rezoned or unzoned by the ministerial direction.
Mr McGrath said the Council had put forward an argument in favour of retaining the material alterations in the plan, but ultimately the Minister sided with OPR.
He said if councillors want to make alterations to the new plan, they could go through the process of making a material alteration but this was lengthy.
The Save Roscam Peninsula campaign welcomed the Minister’s decision.
In a statement to the Galway City Tribune, it said the direction would mean the Roscam village area on the Roscam Peninsula will be unzoned and a number of land parcels would revert back to agriculture/high amenity.
A spokesperson for the campaign said: “the material alterations made by city councillors following lobbying by developers continued the long-standing practice of councillors facilitating a developer-led plan rather than an evidence- and policy-based plan that meets the needs of the city.
“The Minister’s direction is an important step in restoring confidence in the planning system. It is clear from the City Council’s own evidence on future housing projections that there was no requirement to zone these lands for residential purposes in order to meet the needs of the targeted population increase up to 2029,” the spokesperson added.
Families queue up for school’s offer of free house
West has lower cancer survival rates than rest
Galway minors continue to lay waste to all opponents
Gardaí and IFA issue a joint appeal on summer road safety
Marathon Man plans to call a halt – but not before he hits 160 races
