CITY TRIBUNE
Parking perk for people who punish commuting workers
Bradley Bytes – a sort of political column with Dara Bradley
You’d get over the price gouging. It’s the hypocrisy that’d annoy you most.
Officials at Galway City Council last November proposed increasing the cost of parking at local authority car parks by €3 per day to raise revenue.
Yes, the draft budget for 2022 produced by management recommended a 60% hike in parking costs at Dyke Road, College Road and Galway Cathedral. Under Chief Executive Brendan McGrath’s plan, parking rates would have risen from €5 to €8 per day.
But councillors exerted what little power they have and cut the proposed increase by half. So the daily rate in long-stay Council car parks in 2022 was increased to €6.50.
It mostly hits visitors, and people who live outside of the city, or places like Knocknacarra and commute to work in town. A tax on tourists; a tax on workers.
It didn’t get huge attention at the time; media and the public were too distracted by the budget’s sugar and spice and promises of tidal pools in Salthill. But it’s now beginning to sting workers already hit by the spiralling cost of living.
The Council argued that a daily rate of €8 would still mean public car parks were “significantly lagging behind” private car parks. Not true.
The Council €6.50 rate that now applies is far higher than City Park at the Fairgreen, which recently advertised €25 per week for seven-day access – that’s €5 per day for weekdays, with weekends free.
When the budget passed, the Council promised to introduce a monthly €100 ticket. This would mark a saving for commuting workers, with a rate of €3.33 per day.
But while the new daily rate of €6.50 came into effect on January 31, the €100 monthly ticket didn’t. They put up the daily charge without bringing in the saver ticket. Typical!
The budget talked about the “city’s obligations” to the “Climate Change Agenda”. It referenced a “modal shift” being a key element of the Galway Transport Strategy, and a need, “to set the cost of city centre parking at a level that does not undermine travel by public transport as a financially-realistic alternative to car travel”.
The fact is that for many commuters, car parking charges cannot undermine public transport as a financially-realistic alternative to car travel because there is no viable public transport alternative. Twenty years talking about Park and Ride for Connemara commuters – where is it? No trains from Tuam; and cycling from Headford isn’t an option either.
You wouldn’t mind so much if the extra €149,000 from higher parking charges was being spent on active travel. It’s not.
But what really irks people – and here’s where the hypocrisy comes in – is that the €8-a-day rate was proposed by management, many of whom travel to work by car and enjoy free parking in publicly-owned car parking spaces at City Hall. What’s the opportunity cost of that little perk?
This is a shortened preview version of Bradley Bytes. See this week’s Galway City Tribune to read more bytes on Cycling cynics; RTÉ brewing up a storm; GMIT’s extensive property portfolio and Students’ scepticism over NUIG Traveller ally award. You can buy a digital edition HERE.
CITY TRIBUNE
Galway ‘masterplan’ needed to tackle housing and transport crises
From the Galway City Tribune – An impassioned plea for a ‘masterplan’ that would guide Galway City into the future has been made in the Dáil. Galway West TD Catherine Connolly stated this week that there needed to be an all-inclusive approach with “vision and leadership” in order to build a sustainable city.
Deputy Connolly spoke at length at the crisis surrounding traffic and housing in Galway city and said that not all of the blame could be laid at the door of the local authority.
She said that her preference would be the provision of light rail as the main form of public transport, but that this would have to be driven by the government.
“I sat on the local council for 17 years and despaired at all of the solutions going down one road, metaphorically and literally. In 2005 we put Park & Ride into the development plan, but that has not been rolled out. A 2016 transport strategy was outdated at the time and still has not been updated.
“Due to the housing crisis in the city, a task force was set up in 2019. Not a single report or analysis has been published on the cause of the crisis,” added Deputy Connolly.
She then referred to a report from the Land Development Agency (LDA) that identified lands suitable for the provision of housing. But she said that two-thirds of these had significant problems and a large portion was in Merlin Park University Hospital which, she said, would never have housing built on it.
In response, Minister Simon Harris spoke of the continuing job investment in the city and also in higher education, which is his portfolio.
But turning his attention to traffic congestion, he accepted that there were “real issues” when it came to transport, mobility and accessibility around Galway.
“We share the view that we need a Park & Ride facility and I understand there are also Bus Connects plans.
“I also suggest that the City Council reflect on her comments. I am proud to be in a Government that is providing unparalleled levels of investment to local authorities and unparalleled opportunities for local authorities to draw down,” he said.
Then Minister Harris referred to the controversial Galway City Outer Ring Road which he said was “struck down by An Bord Pleanála”, despite a lot of energy having been put into that project.
However, Deputy Connolly picked up on this and pointed out that An Bord Pleanála did not say ‘No’ to the ring road.
“The High Court said ‘No’ to the ring road because An Bord Pleanála acknowledged it failed utterly to consider climate change and our climate change obligations.
“That tells us something about An Bord Pleanála and the management that submitted such a plan.”
In the end, Minister Harris agreed that there needed to be a masterplan for Galway City.
“I suggest it is for the local authority to come up with a vision and then work with the Government to try to fund and implement that.”
CITY TRIBUNE
Official opening of Galway’s new pedestrian and cycle bridge
The new Salmon Weir pedestrian and cycle bridge will be officially opened to the public next Friday, May 26.
Work on the €10 million bridge got underway in April 2022, before the main structure was hoisted into place in early December.
A lunchtime tape-cutting ceremony will take place on Friday, as the first pedestrians and cyclists traverse the as-yet-unnamed bridge.
The Chief Executive of Galway City Council, Brendan McGrath, previously said the bridge, once opened, would remove existing conflicts between pedestrians, cyclists and traffic “as well as facilitating the Cross-City Link public transport corridor over the existing 200-year-old bridge”.
The naming of the new bridge has been under discussion by the Council’s Civic Commemorations Committee since late last year.
One name that has been in the mix for some time is that of the first woman in Europe to graduate with an engineering degree – Alice Perry.
Ms Perry, who was from Wellpark, graduated from Queen’s College Galway (now University of Galway) in 1906. The university’s engineering building is named in her honour.
The bridge was built by Jons Civil Engineering firm in County Meath and was assembled off-site before being transported to Galway. Funding for the project was provided in full by the National Transport Authority and the European Regional Development Fund.
(Photo: Sheila Gallagher captured the city’s new pedestrian footbridge being raised on the south side of the Salmon Weir Bridge in December. It will officially open next Friday, May 26).
CITY TRIBUNE
Minister branded ‘a disgrace’ for reversing land rezoning in Galway City
From the Galway City Tribune – Minister of State for Local Government and Planning, Kieran O’Donnell was labelled a “disgrace” for overturning councillors’ decisions to rezone land in the new City Development Plan.
Minister O’Donnell (pictured) confirmed in a letter to Council Chief Executive Brendan McGrath last week that he was reversing 25 material alternations made by councillors to the CDP 2023-29. He made the decision on the advice of Office of Planning Regulator (OPR).
Minister O’Donnell directed that 14 land parcels that were subject to land-use zoning changes by councillors as part of the Material Alterations to the Draft CDP should be reversed.
He directed that a further 11 land parcels in the city should become “unzoned”.
The Minister found that the CDP had not been made in a manner consistent with recommendations of the OPR, which required specific changes to the plan to ensure consistency with the national planning laws and guidelines.
At last week’s Council meeting Cllr Eddie Hoare (FG) asked for clarity on the process by which councillors could rezone the lands that had been changed by the Minister’s direction.
Cllr Declan McDonnell said, “What he [Minister O’Donnell] has done is an absolute disgrace”.
And he asked: “Do we have to have another development plan meeting to deal with it?”
Both Cllrs Hoare and McDonnell wondered what would become of the lands that were rezoned or unzoned by the ministerial direction.
Mr McGrath said the Council had put forward an argument in favour of retaining the material alterations in the plan, but ultimately the Minister sided with OPR.
He said if councillors want to make alterations to the new plan, they could go through the process of making a material alteration but this was lengthy.
The Save Roscam Peninsula campaign welcomed the Minister’s decision.
In a statement to the Galway City Tribune, it said the direction would mean the Roscam village area on the Roscam Peninsula will be unzoned and a number of land parcels would revert back to agriculture/high amenity.
A spokesperson for the campaign said: “the material alterations made by city councillors following lobbying by developers continued the long-standing practice of councillors facilitating a developer-led plan rather than an evidence- and policy-based plan that meets the needs of the city.
“The Minister’s direction is an important step in restoring confidence in the planning system. It is clear from the City Council’s own evidence on future housing projections that there was no requirement to zone these lands for residential purposes in order to meet the needs of the targeted population increase up to 2029,” the spokesperson added.